CBD LawCBD LawCBD LawCBD Law
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS LAW
    • PERSONAL INJURY & INSURANCE
    • ESTATE & PROBATE
    • FAMILY LAW
    • PROPERTY LAW
    • BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION
    • COURT & DEBT RECOVERY
  • Our Team
    • GILES FINNEY
    • JAMES PARKIN
    • KYE BRUCE
    • MELISSA PEARCE
    • HILLARY MORRIS
    • KATE BRAME
    • BEVERLEY PRITCHATT
    • TRISH JEFFREY
    • REID FINNEY
    • MARGARET FLAHERTY
    • KELLEY LEDSON
    • WHITNEY MORRIS
  • News
    • Commercial
    • Workers Compensation and Workplace
    • Family Law
    • Wills & Estates
    • Building Disputes
    • Court News
    • General Interest
    • Power of Attorney – Enduring Guardianship
    • Property
    • Criminal Law
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Does the Court consider your “special skill” within your marriage?

    Home Family Law Does the Court consider your “special skill” within your marriage?

    Does the Court consider your “special skill” within your marriage?

    By Hillary Morris | Family Law | 3 April, 2016 | 0

    Do I get an adjustment for “Special Skill”?

    The full Court in Kane v Kane has decided that there is no separate doctrine of special contribution or special skill that should be looked at separately but the Court should look at that aspect in context of balancing contributions generally.

    Kane v Kane involved a 29 year relationship with the contributions in general being equal.  However, the Husband made decisions in relation to the Superannuation fund.  In the course of managing the Super fund the Husband after research decided to invest in a particular company.  The Wife was reluctant but the investment was made and ultimately the investment resulted in a substantial windfall for the Superannuation fund. 

    The trial Judge adjusted the assets outside of the Super equally (roughly $400,000.00 each) and the Super fund worth $3.4 million – 2/3rd  in favour of the Husband and 1/3rd in favour of the Wife.  This resulted in an overall split of all matrimonial assets of about 64% to the Husband and 36% to the Wife. 

    The Wife appealed.  The full Court was not entirely convinced that the windfall in the Super fund was as a result of any special skill or acumen.  The full Court saw it more as purchasing a lottery ticket.  The full Court noted that if losses were made in investment portfolios parties did not generally seek to have losses attributed to the party responsible for making the investment decision. 

    The Court decided that any separate doctrine of “special contribution” should be reconsidered.  The Court noted that “it is almost impossible to determine questions such as – ‘was he a good businessman/artist/surgeon or just lucky?  Was she a good cook/housekeeper/entertainer or just an attractive personality?  We think it invidious for a Judge to in effect to ‘give marks’ to a Wife or Husband during a marriage.”

    As a result, the Court decided that all contributions should be assessed in an overall consideration of the factors in Section 79 (4) (which the Court noted did not contain the words “like/special” or “extraordinary”. 

    So your “special contribution” or “special skill” will be taken into account but only as part of an analysis on an overall assessment rather than being viewed in isolation. 

    No tags.

    BACK TO NEWS

    Recent News

    • Successful Court of Appeal Hearing for our client
    • An Ever Moving Family Law System
    • Cross Vesting, Third Parties and The Interaction Between Courts
    • Commencement of the new Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
    • Recovery Information for Councils impacted by bushfires in NSW
    • Relocation of Children – Interstate Or Internationally
    • Importance Of Finalising Your Will
    • Case Note: Possession Of Commercial Quantity – Yin v R [2019]
    • Appeal Lost For Young Offender Involved In The Shooting Of Mr Cheng
    • Criminal Law Sentencing Note – Simpson v R [2019]

    Gosford Office

    98 Mann St, Gosford NSW 2250
    PO Box 59, Gosford NSW 2250
    Ph: (02) 4322 6666
    Fax: (02) 4322 6966
    Email: reception@cbdlaw.com.au

    Wyong Office

    25-27 Alison Rd, Wyong NSW 2259
    Ph: (02) 4353 1248
    Fax: (02) 4351 2401
    Email: wyong@cbdlaw.com.au
    © CBD Law 2021 - 2025 | Privacy Policy | Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Our Services
      • COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS LAW
      • PERSONAL INJURY & INSURANCE
      • ESTATE & PROBATE
      • FAMILY LAW
      • PROPERTY LAW
      • BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION
      • COURT & DEBT RECOVERY
    • Our Team
      • GILES FINNEY
      • JAMES PARKIN
      • KYE BRUCE
      • MELISSA PEARCE
      • HILLARY MORRIS
      • KATE BRAME
      • BEVERLEY PRITCHATT
      • TRISH JEFFREY
      • REID FINNEY
      • MARGARET FLAHERTY
      • KELLEY LEDSON
      • WHITNEY MORRIS
    • News
      • Commercial
      • Workers Compensation and Workplace
      • Family Law
      • Wills & Estates
      • Building Disputes
      • Court News
      • General Interest
      • Power of Attorney – Enduring Guardianship
      • Property
      • Criminal Law
    • Resources
    • Contact Us
    CBD Law